From the category archives:

google

If you scroll down and look at the right side of the blog, you’ll notice an “In the News” section. It’s the Google News Bar, which lets me select which keywords I want, and displays snippets of timely news articles from Google News Search. And when I loaded it up, it thoughtfully linked to both Dan Savage and Mistress Matisse’s columns.

See the keywords at the top of the news bar? Click on a word and then relevant stories will be loaded.

Here’s the page with a bunch of wizards that lets you add Google stuff to your blog or website.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Because of Audacia’s book tour, I’ve got calendars on my mind today. I’ve been playing with both Google Calendar and Upcoming for listings of events. Google Calendar is very nice, but when I published it, all the times were off by 3 hours and I couldn’t figure out how to fix it. The times on the computers I set it up on were correct.

Today I’ve been playing with Upcoming.org. I like the social bookmark feature – I found Audacia and Rachel’s events and was able to add them. Also, many venues are in the Upcoming database. I really like not having to re-enter data! And you can add pictures to your events. And I found a bunch of other relevant events.

Check out the right sidebar – I’ve got a list of events from Upcoming.org there.

And if you have events, or a profile, let me know so I can add them!

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

If you have a Google Mail account, you must read this. Please cross post!

A blogger alerted me to a potential security problem with Google Mail. As you probably know, Google Mail can be set up to send email from your other email addresses. You can also forward email to one account.

If you’re like me, you have several email addresses. A primary one, and a separate one for your blog activities. So these tools make it very easy and you don’t have to log in and out of multiple email accounts (or perhaps you use the Gmail Manager plug-in for your browser).

Gmail also lets you set your ‘reply preferences’ so that you can reply ‘as if” from the forwarded address (http://tinyurl.com/ytb86h).

So let’s say I have an email account under my real name. Let’s call it ‘realname@gmail.com.’ And I have another email address for my blog. Let’s call that ‘blogname@gmail.com.’

I can have all that forwarded to realname@gmail.com, and reply from the realname address, thinking the recipients email will say, ‘from blogname @ gmail” (or whatever ‘reply-to’ address you set up).

The recipient WILL get an email saying, ‘from blogname@gmail.com.’

Here’s what this blogger experienced:

Here is the problem: If the recipient *also* has Google Mail, my ‘realname’ email is automatically added to their contacts list, even though they’ve never received an email “from” my ‘realname’ account.

So there may well be people out there who are using one Gmail account as ‘primary’, which receives forwarded email from another account, who think they are replying to forwarded mail and think that the Gmail “reply as” function is preserving their anonymity, but it is not. Not if they are replying to someone with a Google Mail acct. The real Google Mail acct, the one they actually wrote the email from, will be auto-added as a contact to the recipients list of Google Chat contacts.

Most people (recipients) will not notice, not if they have had a Gmail acct for a long time–quick contacts only shows who you email most, and the new address will just be one on a long hidden list. If the recipient is someone with a brand new Gmail account, or someone who blocks contacts, it’s very, very obvious.

My friend who has more than one blog just answered a new sex blogger in this way, and got back an email saying, hey, are you also so-and-so? My friend called me and we checked this with my work Gmail, which I never list contacts on. Her ‘blogname” address appeared in my contact function immediately when she emailed me of course, but her primary one appeared there as soon as I replied to the ‘blogname’ address.

So this brand new blogger, a stranger to my friend, now knows about both her blogs. Fortunately it was only a blogging address and not one tied to her work, but it very easily could have been.

I did test this with another blogger and we weren’t able to duplicate it. However, we discovered something alarming. I added her ‘blogname’ address’ to my contacts list.

I then went into the Contacts list and pulled up this contact’s record and expanded it, by clicking on ‘Edit Contact’, and then ‘Add More Contact Info”. Under the ‘Personal’ section for email, was listed her ‘realname’ address.

As soon as I figured this out, I went into ‘Settings’ and deleted all the other accounts I was managing from the primary account.

If you’re concerned about your privacy, you should, too.

I’ve written Google Mail to advise them about this issue. And I’m checking my Contacts list and expanding contacts to see if I see any other email addresses in a contact’s record. I’ve found one contact already where I can see their other email address.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Are Google AdWords out of line with Google sex queries? Violet Blue questions the propensity of Google AdWords to completely misrepresent searches on the web browser in this article:

With equal parts bitter irony, offense and amusement, I receive regular e-mails from Open Source Sex readers about the keyword-generated Google AdWords text ads that regularly populate the bottom of this page. Take a look at a few of my columns — especially the porn entries — and you’ll be, er, treated to a fat serving of sexually shaming “porn addiction — get help” text ads. Which, of course, run totally against the grain of the pro-porn message I’m dishing out. Because I want you all to get help, too — help finding better porn, that is.

But I’ve never been shocked about this: Google AdWords has a rep for pairing inappropriate (if not offensive) text ads with the original content it’s posted with — especially when it comes to sex. AdWords’ insensitivities might seem trifling or even amusing on the surface (let’s assume those of you reading my column feel OK about porn enough to disregard the douchey anti-porn ads at the bottom of the page), but those trying to make a positive change in the way their sexuality is portrayed in the wider culture are facing a David vs. Goliath battle of keywords.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }