privacy

Let us be clear: this is not a fight between ‘old’ and ‘new’ media. This not about blogger vengeance or a mob mentality wanting to lay in to print media. This is about journalistic integrity, immorality, and a few unethical hacks desperate to make their mark in the newspaper industry.

The digital age has given people access to instant information, interactive feedback, and the freedom to reply, so the vast, angry, Internet response to The Sunday Times outing me, and, indeed, last week’s outing of fellow anonymous blogger Night Jack, by sister paper The Times was not a bloggers vs. journalists battle. Instead, it was simply a reaction of disgust that journalistic standards have sunk so low: is this what ‘news’ reporting has come to?

The journalist who outed me has now justified doing so by stating my anonymity was a “marketing gimmick”; this just smacks of pathetic desperation. My writing a sexblog and book was hardly newsworthy – it’s not like I was writing about anything criminal, or shagging a politician – and my being anonymous for almost three years, until I was outed, doesn’t support this supposed pre-meditated book-selling ploy.

I had my reasons for wanting to remain anonymous, as all anon bloggers do, and did everything in my power to remain so; sadly that wasn’t enough for this keen journalist, eager to get her foot on the quality journalistic ladder.

Link

As a prosecutor, the first thing I do when I get a case is to Google the victim, the suspect, and all the material witnesses. I run them all through Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, You Tube and see what I might get. I also do a “Google image search” and see what pops up. Sometimes there’s nothing, but other times I get the goods– pictures, status updates, and better yet, blogs and articles they’ve written.

How fantastic is that? A blog written by the suspect about his mind set, plans, or ideas….hmmm….no Fifth Amendment problems here. And it’sa beautiful statement in his own words. It’s all there for the taking and I take it and shove it right down his throat in court.

And let me tell you, I am not alone. I anticipate that the lawyer on the other side will do the same thing, so I prepare my witnesses and victims for it, just as I’m now preparing you. So all you potential litigants, parties to lawsuits, plaintiffs, defendants, victims, and suspects….don’t say I didn’t tell you. You, too, are being watched, searched, Googled and twittered. And that means you, too, counsel!

Link

Intro To Sex Blogging

View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: sex security)

Here are my slides from Monday’s talk at Conversio Virium. I spent much more time talking about sexual privacy than about setup and promotion. Thanks again to Elizabeth and MayMay for the opportunity to speak. This presentation is available on the Blogging page.

. . . Facebook’s privacy settings are the most flexible and the most confusing privacy settings in the industry. Over and over again, I interview teens (and adults) who think that they’ve set their privacy settings to do one thing and are shocked (and sometimes horrified) to learn that their privacy settings do something else. Furthermore, because of things like tagged photos, people are often unaware of the visibility of content that they did not directly contribute. People continue to get themselves into trouble because they lack the control that they think they have. And this ain’t just about teenagers. Teachers/professors – are you _sure_ that the photos that your friends post and tag with your name aren’t visible to your students? Parents – I know many of you joined to snoop on your kids… now that your high school mates are joining, are your kids snooping on you? Power dynamics are a bitch, whether your 16 or 40.

Why are privacy settings still an abstract process removed from the context of the content itself? Privacy settings shouldn’t just be about control; they should be about the combination of awareness, context, and control. You should understand the visibility of an act during the moment of the act itself and whenever you are accessing the tracings of the act.

Tech developers… I implore you… put privacy information into the context of the content itself. When I post a photo in my album, let me see a list of EVERYONE who can view that photo. When I look at a photo on someone’s profile, let me see everyone else who can view that photo before I go to write a comment. You don’t get people to understand the scale of visibility by tweetling a few privacy settings every few months and having no idea what “Friends of Friends” actually means. If you have that setting on and you go to post a photo and realize that it will be visible to 5,000 people included 10 ex-lovers, you’re going to think twice. Or you’re going to change your privacy settings.

Link.

[via Boffery]

button1 bm AddThis.com Widget Privacy Warning

I used to use the AddThis bookmarking widget, because it let users add content to many different services and didn’t look too cluttered.

My friend JC forwarded me an email from the WWWAC list. Addthis was bought by ClearSpring last month. Starting yesterday today, they are now slipping a ClearSpring Flash Tracker Object into all your pages. Like all flash trackers, these use cookie-busting LSOs to track users across all websites that utilize AddThis or ClearSpring technologies:

These cookies are not visible within user’s normal privacy options windows in their browsers and can not be cleared by using the browser’s Clear Private Data (Firefox) and similar privacy options. These cookies also work across all browsers on the machine as Flash stores these LSOs in a single location.

There’s more info at JohnHaller.com. He’s the author of the Portable Firefox program.

I’ve removed the widget from my blog and Lolita Wolf‘s blog, and suggest you to do the same.

Let’s talk security and why you should take advantage of Gmail’s recent SSL feature, and why you might want to be careful using other non-SSL webmail services.

But first, make sure your connection is secured using SSL.

How do you know a connection is secured by SSL? The handy “s” after “http” will tell you. For example, https://mail.google.com is encrypted while http://mail.google.com is not. You can force an encryption by adding the “s” yourself, or by turning on “Always use https” from the Browser Connection settings of your Gmail account.

Link

As soon as I read this, I turned on SSL security: Settings | General | Browser Connection | Always Use https.

…In all this time, only three people have tied the real person to the blog without my help. One was told the URL by an irate friend; I am now at peace about this. The other two people, my parents, were told by God. I am most decidedly not at peace about this.

They know the address, but they maintain that they have not yet read the writing here. They’ve only read places where it’s been linked or mentioned on other sites. Therefore they seem to have an unnecessarily unbalanced view of what I’m writing, and by extension, of what I’m doing with my life.

I’m torn. I’ve been torn for the weeks since they told me of the trespass.

I could, I suppose, refuse entirely to discuss this with them. They stepped where I’d specifically asked them not to; it would seem reasonable not to let them gather any more knowledge than they already have. I could block their IP (for what it’s worth) or demand that they knock off the intrusiveness.

This option brings with it a boatload of complications. They already violated my wishes by hunting me down; they prolly aren’t going to be too pleased to be told that it’s not up for further discussion. Nor too willing to comply. Most importantly, it does not address the basis of the problem: They want more access into my life.
(more . . .)

Last month a US court ruled that border agents can search your laptop, or any other electronic device, when you’re entering the country. They can take your computer and download its entire contents, or keep it for several days. Customs and Border Patrol has not published any rules regarding this practice, and I and others have written a letter to Congress urging it to investigate and regulate this practice.

But the US is not alone. British customs agents search laptops for pornography. And there are reports on the internet of this sort of thing happening at other borders, too. You might not like it, but it’s a fact. So how do you protect yourself?

. . . So your best defence is to clean up your laptop. A customs agent can’t read what you don’t have. You don’t need five years’ worth of email and client data. You don’t need your old love letters and those photos (you know the ones I’m talking about). Delete everything you don’t absolutely need. And use a secure file erasure program to do it. While you’re at it, delete your browser’s cookies, cache and browsing history. It’s nobody’s business what websites you’ve visited. And turn your computer off – don’t just put it to sleep – before you go through customs; that deletes other things. Think of all this as the last thing to do before you stow your electronic devices for landing. Some companies now give their employees forensically clean laptops for travel, and have them download any sensitive data over a virtual private network once they’ve entered the country. They send any work back the same way, and delete everything again before crossing the border to go home. This is a good idea if you can do it.

If you can’t, consider putting your sensitive data on a USB drive or even a camera memory card: even 16GB cards are reasonably priced these days. Encrypt it, of course, because it’s easy to lose something that small. Slip it in your pocket, and it’s likely to remain unnoticed even if the customs agent pokes through your laptop. If someone does discover it, you can try saying: “I don’t know what’s on there. My boss told me to give it to the head of the New York office.” If you’ve chosen a strong encryption password, you won’t care if he confiscates it.

(more . . .)

sex 20 This weekend: Sex 2.0 in Atlanta

Sex 2.0 will focus on the intersection of social media, feminism, and sexuality. How is social media enabling people to learn, grow, and connect sexually? How is sexual expression tied to social activism? Does the concept of transparency online offer new opportunities or present new roadblocks — or both? These questions, and many more, will be addressed within a safe, welcoming, sex-positive space.

Respecting the confidentiality and protecting the identities of participants who wish to maintain a degree of anonymity will be a top priority at Sex 2.0.

When? April 12, 2008
Where? 1763~A Deviant Place of Decadence, 1763 Montreal Circle, Tucker, Ga., 30084 (directions)
How much? $50
Registration in advance is mandatory; no walk up registrations will be accepted.

I’m going to be presenting about a nuts and bolts talk on how to be a sex blogger – a quick tour of key blogs, setting up your first blog, privacy issues, getting the word out about your blog, and working with affiliate accounts.

I’m going to be bookmarking pertinent sites at del.icious: http://del.icio.us/viviane with the Sex2.0 tag.

Twitter: Many of the speakers are on Twitter, and hopefully will be live twitting the conference:

Amber Rhea
Rachel Kramer Bussel
Funky Brown Chick
Cunning Minx
Melissa Gira
Furry Girl
Muse Carmona
jbrotherlove
Ellie Lumpesse
Regina Lynn
Match
Mistress Maeve
Audacia Ray
Tara Sawyer
Rusty Tanton
Viviane
Jennifer W
Elizabeth Wood

(If you’re wondering what the heck is Twitter, Match provided a link to a great explanation.)

And I’ll be posting pictures of what I eat at Waffle House, just to tease Jonno and Mr. Gimlet. ;-D