Comments on: Psychiatric Evaluation http://www.thesexcarnival.com/2008/09/psychiatric-evaluation/ A group link blog about sex and sexuality. This site contains adult content which may include images, soundsand videos of a sexually explicit nature. If you are under 18, please leave the site now. Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:08:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Tear Drop http://www.thesexcarnival.com/2008/09/psychiatric-evaluation/comment-page-1/#comment-3079 Tear Drop Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:29:05 +0000 http://www.thesexcarnival.com/?p=6724#comment-3079 Thank you for the link, Viviane. There's nowhere to post on Jefferson's blog, so I thought I'd post here. First, I can't even imagine how draining it must be to face a custody dispute. Second, I strongly feel that the children's interests shold come first, and I do not see how a person's lifestyle on his or her's "off" hours impact those interests. As to the first amendment question, my understanding is that a court could not tell a parent that they could not blog. However, there is nothing to stop a court from using what is written in that blog as evidence. It's public information. You have a right to say whatever you want, but there are sometimes consequences for what you say. Bloggers have lost jobs for making fun of their places of employment. It's employment at will. It's not a free speech issue. I think the more important issue is do we allow parents to be sexual creatures. There seems to be this unwritten rule that if you are a parent, you can't be a pervert. Or sexually promiscuous. Assuming you take precautions against diseases and for your safety, how does having lots of sex when you are not with your kids affect your children? Kids, generally speaking, do not want to be raised by asexual creatures. They just want their parents. Thank you for the link, Viviane. There’s nowhere to post on Jefferson’s blog, so I thought I’d post here. First, I can’t even imagine how draining it must be to face a custody dispute. Second, I strongly feel that the children’s interests shold come first, and I do not see how a person’s lifestyle on his or her’s “off” hours impact those interests.

As to the first amendment question, my understanding is that a court could not tell a parent that they could not blog. However, there is nothing to stop a court from using what is written in that blog as evidence. It’s public information. You have a right to say whatever you want, but there are sometimes consequences for what you say. Bloggers have lost jobs for making fun of their places of employment. It’s employment at will. It’s not a free speech issue.

I think the more important issue is do we allow parents to be sexual creatures. There seems to be this unwritten rule that if you are a parent, you can’t be a pervert. Or sexually promiscuous. Assuming you take precautions against diseases and for your safety, how does having lots of sex when you are not with your kids affect your children? Kids, generally speaking, do not want to be raised by asexual creatures. They just want their parents.

]]>