<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Irritating Neologism: &#8216;Brokeback Marriages&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesexcarnival.com/2006/03/irritating-neologism-brokeback-marriages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesexcarnival.com/2006/03/irritating-neologism-brokeback-marriages/</link>
	<description>A group link blog about sex and sexuality. This site contains adult content which may include images, soundsand videos of a sexually explicit nature. If you are under 18, please leave the site now.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raven in NYC (aka Mark)</title>
		<link>http://www.thesexcarnival.com/2006/03/irritating-neologism-brokeback-marriages/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Raven in NYC (aka Mark)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesexcarnival.com/2006/03/08/irritating-neologism-brokeback-marriages/#comment-799</guid>
		<description>Despite the unfortunate pop-culture headline, I was surprised at the evenhandedness of this articl. Though the frustrating thing about this article is that is made two assumptions: 1) that only men enter into a "traditional marraige" when other feelings are in the mix and, bigger, 2) there is the assumption that men who do enter such marriages are hiding/denying their true gayness. I know for me that is not the case at all. There is truth in my bisexuality. There may be some partners who can't live with and accept this dual attraction and thus the marriage fails. However, they didn't go far enough to explore those that do survive and how.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the unfortunate pop-culture headline, I was surprised at the evenhandedness of this articl. Though the frustrating thing about this article is that is made two assumptions: 1) that only men enter into a &#8220;traditional marraige&#8221; when other feelings are in the mix and, bigger, 2) there is the assumption that men who do enter such marriages are hiding/denying their true gayness. I know for me that is not the case at all. There is truth in my bisexuality. There may be some partners who can&#8217;t live with and accept this dual attraction and thus the marriage fails. However, they didn&#8217;t go far enough to explore those that do survive and how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
